Thursday, 20 October 2011

The Essay (Week 12)

All done! So here it is. The question I chose was:

Choose a William Gibson short story such as Burning Chrome (see readings week 10). Compare the economic and social world it conjures with the imagined world of another cyberpunk author’s short story or novel (Neal Stephenson's 'Snow Crash.'). How close are these imagined worlds to our world and are we moving towards the imagined worlds or away from them?

And here it is:


Cyberpunk is a term coined by Bruce Bethke in 1982, and later popularised by science fiction editor Gardner Dozois (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2011). It describes a wide genre, encompassing film, literature, art, and even music. The core concept behind all of these however, is the idea of a disillusioned loner on the edge of society, fighting a world that is increasingly technological and dehumanised. Many science fiction authors have written in the genre, among them household names like William Gibson, considered by many to have written the archetypal cyberpunk work with ‘Neuromancer,’ and Neal Stephenson, a relative newcomer to the genre. A common factor in all cyberpunk literature, including both Gibson and Stephenson, is the speculation of the technological, social, and economic situation that will be present in the future, evident through their novels. This essay will compare two cyberpunk works, ‘Burning Chrome,’ by William Gibson, and ‘Snow Crash,’ by Neal Stephenson, in terms of the social and economic futures predicted by the novels. This will then be compared with reality of the modern day, and as to whether these predictions are realistic.

The social futures typically presented by the cyberpunk genre are that of a dystopian society, generally in decline, with the advancement of technology disrupting society and the way the inhabitants of the society interact. This can be seen in both Burning Chrome and Snow Crash, with possibly the most important technological advancement in the novels – the Simulation Matrix, and the Metaverse. In Burning Chrome, the Matrix is “an abstract representation of the relationships between data systems,” a 3D virtual word in which the user is completely immersed (Gibson, 1986 p.196). The Metaverse, in comparison, is a 3D virtual world in which you can create or purchase your ‘avatar,’ and interact with other people in real-time. Property and advertisements, or ‘animercials,’ can be purchased using real money, in the virtual world. There is a blurring between life in reality, and life in the Metaverse.
This decline of society can also be seen in the way in which the physical society is structured in both novels. In Burning Chrome, the story is set in the Sprawl, a colloquial term for the Boston-Atlanta Metropolitan Axis, a huge megacity. In this representation of the future, space is at a premium, and virtually the entire East Coast of the United States has merged into one huge city. The majority of people are poor, but technology is easily accessible to all, allowing anyone to access the Matrix, or enjoy ‘simstims,’ a form of entertainment that allows people to experience a television program as seen through the eyes of the protagonist. Enhancements and augmentations to the body are also available, with the main character of the novel having a mechanised prosthetic arm, and other characters having eye augmentations, allowing them to record video through tiny cameras implanted in their eyes – the basis for simstim. In Snow Crash, society has disintegrated even further; governments and nations have broken down, and areas, armed forces, and even religions are owned by huge corporations, such as “Mr Lee’s Greater Hong Kong,” or “The Reverend Wayne’s Pearly Gates.” Universal laws and the justice system don’t exist; each corporation, or ‘franchise,’ has their own set of laws for their different areas, enforced by a private security corporation. As a result, crime isn’t necessarily wrong anymore - the Mafia operate in the open, as just another corporation. Society is dominated and controlled by corporations, and as such, money.

In the same way as society is generally portrayed as declining in the cyberpunk genre, the economy of these future times is usually just as grim, and is closely intertwined with the state of society itself. There is a large gap between the poor and the rich, and few in the middle ground. Technology has advanced, but the imagined ‘better life’ or ‘utopia’ that it would bring has fallen far short, a concept central to cyberpunk. In Burning Chrome, while technology and its benefits are available to anyone, irrespective of their financial status, the majority of citizens in the Sprawl just manage to scrape a living. Lower quality technology is available for a cheaper price, but it has serious side effects, as can be seen with the Seikon eye-implants. Apartments and living spaces are squashed together, and the population has skyrocketed. Snow Crash has a similar view of the economic future, in a system that can be described as ‘anarcho-capitalism.’ Governments and nations have collapsed, or are generally ignored, everything has been privatised, and hyperinflation has occurred, with “street people pushing wheelbarrows piled high with dripping clots of million- and billion-dollar bills that they have raked up out of storm sewers” (Stephenson, 1992 p.146) Space is also at a premium, with people (including the protagonist) living in shipping containers, or regimented identical housing estates. There is just as great a distinction between rich and poor, and society; religions, roads, housing, land, justice, and defense, are run entirely by corporations and businesses, all competing. The line between reality and the Metaverse has blurred, and money can be made through the virtual world, and vice versa, with the sale of land, avatars, and entertainment.

Aspects of the societal and economic futures predicted in both cyberpunk novels are certainly possible in reality both in the future, and today. In terms of technology – the worlds presented in both these novels are either already possible, or well on their way. Car HUDs on windscreens, Virtual Reality worlds, the Matrix, more advanced computers and devices – it’s just a matter of time, as our own level of technology rises. In terms of the social and economic futures presented, it’s less certain. It’s true we are withdrawing, communicating more through technology and becoming increasingly isolated, despite having more connections than ever before (Fox, 2010). Facebook can be seen as a primitive form of the Metaverse, while the internet itself is similar to both the Metaverse and the Matrix. We spend most of our time using it, either for entertainment, communication, or work. It is a medium through which you can become someone else, do things you couldn’t in real life – and things you could. Money can be made through it, despite the fact that it doesn’t physically exist. The economic future presented by both novels, can also be seen in today’s world, albeit to a lesser extent. Our world population is rising, corporations have more power and money than some governments, the gap between rich and poor is broadening, and technology, while advancing, is also becoming cheaper and more available (Deen, 2005; Sarno, 2011; AP, 2008). While this technological advancement has huge benefits for some, we are increasingly moving closer towards the dystopia of the cyberpunk future: the failed promise that technology will make life better for everyone.  


References
-          Associated Press, 2008, ‘Study: Gap growing between rich and poor,’ viewed 20 October, at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27295405/ns/business-world_business/t/study-gap-growing-between-rich-poor/

-          Deen, T 2005, ‘Rising population threatens global security,’ viewed 19 October, at http://www.un.org/special-rep/ohrlls/News_flash2005/08%20July%20rising%20population.htm
-          Encyclopædia Britannica 2011, ‘Cyberpunk,’ viewed 11 October, at http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/147816/cyberpunk

-          Fox, M 2010, ‘New health policy: encouraging friendships?’ viewed 20 October, at http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/07/27/us-lifespan-relationships-idUSTRE66Q6KA20100727

-          Gibson, W 1986, ‘Burning Chrome,’ Harper Collins: Great Britain, London.

-          Sarno, D 2011, ‘Apple has more cash than US government,’ viewed 19 October, at http://www.smh.com.au/technology/biz-tech/apple-has-more-cash-than-us-government-20110801-1i6x6.html

-           Stephenson, N 1992, ‘Snow Crash,’ Bantam Books: New York


So there it is! I didn't post much up in the preceeding weeks, because a lot of the research required was just reading the two novels being compared. That, and the facts in the conclusion.

I hope you enjoyed it!

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

The Essay: nearly done! (Week 12)

Well the book arrived on Monday (which was a relief), and I managed to finish it yesterday. It's actually quite a good read, cyberpunk while also slightly satirical. Anyway, I finished the first body paragraph, that focuses on comparisons between the social structure presented in both books. In the main body paragraphs, I focus on camparing the two books, while in the final paragraph, the conclusion, I comment on its relevance and realism in regards to today's world.

Here's the social paragraph. I've nearly finished the economic comparisons too, so you can probably expect the entire essay to be up later tonight.



The social futures typically presented by the cyberpunk genre are that of a dystopian society, generally in decline, with the advancement of technology disrupting society and the way the inhabitants of the society interact. This can be seen in both Burning Chrome and Snow Crash, with possibly the most important technological advancement in the novels – the Simulation Matrix, and the Metaverse. In Burning Chrome, the Matrix is “an abstract representation of the relationships between data systems,” a 3D virtual word in which the user is completely immersed (Gibson, 1986 p.196). The Metaverse, in comparison, is a 3D virtual world in which you can create or purchase your ‘avatar,’ and interact with other people in real-time. Property and advertisements, or ‘animercials,’ can be purchased using real money, in the virtual world. There is a blurring between life in reality, and life in the Metaverse.
This decline of society can also be seen in the way in which the physical society is structured in both novels. In Burning Chrome, the story is set in the Sprawl, a colloquial term for the Boston-Atlanta Metropolitan Axis, a huge megacity. In this representation of the future, space is at a premium, and virtually the entire East Coast of the United States has merged into one huge city. The majority of people are poor, but technology is easily accessible to all, allowing anyone to access the Matrix, or enjoy ‘simstims,’ a form of entertainment that allows people to experience a television program as seen through the eyes of the protagonist. Enhancements and augmentations to the body are also available, with the main character of the novel having a mechanised prosthetic arm, and other characters having eye augmentations, allowing them to record video through tiny cameras implanted in their eyes – the basis for simstim. In Snow Crash, society has disintegrated even further; governments and nations have broken down, and areas, armed forces, and even religions are owned by huge corporations, such as “Mr Lee’s Greater Hong Kong,” or “The Reverend Wayne’s Pearly Gates.” Universal laws and the justice system don’t exist; each corporation, or ‘franchise,’ has their own set of laws for their different areas, enforced by a private security corporation. As a result, crime isn’t necessarily wrong anymore - the Mafia operate in the open, as just another corporation. Society is dominated and controlled by corporations, and as such, money.


I'll include references with the final essay. 

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

Essay introduction (Week 11)

So I decided to use 'Snow Crash' by Neal Stephenson. Unfortunately, seeing as I couldn't find it in any bookshops, I had to order it online. This wouldn't be a problem, as I ordered it about 2 weeks ago, but it still hasn't come. It should be here in a couple of days though. Hopefully.

Anyway, I was still able to write the draft introduction to my essay, which is as follows:


Cyberpunk is a term coined by Bruce Bethke in 1982, and later popularised by science fiction editor Gardner Dozois. It describes a wide genre, encompassing film, literature, art, and even music. The core concept behind all of these however, is the idea of a disillusioned loner on the edge of society, fighting a world that is increasingly technological and dehumanised. Many science fiction authors have written in the genre, among them household names like William Gibson, considered by many to have written the archetypal cyberpunk work with ‘Neuromancer,’ and Neal Stephenson, a relative newcomer to the genre. A common factor in all cyberpunk literature, including both Gibson and Stephenson, is the speculation of the technological, social, and economic situation that will be present in the future, evident through their novels. This essay will compare two cyberpunk works, ‘Burning Chrome,’ by William Gibson, and ‘Snow Crash,’ by Neal Stephenson, in terms of the social and economic futures predicted by the novels. This will then be compared with reality of the modern day, and as to whether these predictions are realistic.

And then I'll go on into my two main body paragraphs as discussed in my essay plan.
Here's hoping my book will arrive soon.

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

Blog Video (Week 9)

So I finished my video!
It's a little long, not including the title and credits, it's about 8 seconds over. But I got to the point where if I cut anything out, it wouldn't work very well. Also, the volume is pretty quiet for some annoying reason, so turn up your speakers when you're watching it.
It's called Incursion.




Concept:
'A man alone in a building late at night hears a noise, and seeks to find the cause of it.'

Shot with an iPhone, edited in iMovie, with the soundtrack via Creative Commons, edited in Garageband.

Thanks to:
Peter JM
Earl M

Sound:
- 'Movie Suspense' - Mike Koenig
- 'Witness the Fall of this Realm' - Dereleech
- 'Wither' - Scabeater
- 'Bump in the Night' - Kevin MacLeod
- 'Right Behind You' - Kevin MacLeod
- 'Supernatural Season 5' (less than 10% and for student non-commercial use) - Jay Gruska & Christopher Lennertz

This video is licensed under Creative Commons; it may be used and edited with attribution, but may not be used for commercial purposes.

Hope you  enjoy!

Censorsh*p and Democracy (Week 9)

This weeks lecture was on politics and the internet, and the ties between the two. One big way in which politics is impacting the internet, and vice versa, is censorship.

Censorship (or Shenshorship, if you're Sean Connery) is a big issue in Australian politics, particularly among the more internet savvy. The government wanted to introduce what they called the 'Clean Feed,' that is, a firewall that blocked sites that the government deemed dangerous or harmful. Their argument was that this would restrict access to terrorist and crime sites, as well as the adult sites that were particularly nasty, like child pornography.

Due to "limited interest" from the industry, the government dropped funding for the project. That said, our internet is currently being filtered right now. Telstra and Optus have both agreed to a voluntary censorship scheme in which they block more than 500 child abuse sites (and rightly so). 

There are plenty of people out there who want an 'Open Internet,' an internet free of censorship and firewalls. They argue that the idea of blocking single websites is a futile effort. As stated by System Administrators Guild of Australia board member Donna Ashelford, "The effectiveness will be trivial because you're just blocking a single website address (and) a person can get around it by changing that address with one character." In addition, the filter wouldn't block P2P networks or file sharing, so people distributing the offending material could simply go around it. And then there's the whole argument as to whether such a restriction would be 'unconstitutional.'

So does censorship have a place in a democratic society? Or is it an echo of China and the current restrictions there?

The United States of America, with Hillary Clinton, evidently believe that censorship is undemocratic. She gave a speech on internet freedom in the US and its importance.
"Now, ultimately, this issue isn’t just about information freedom; it is about what kind of world we want and what kind of world we will inhabit. It’s about whether we live on a planet with one internet, one global community, and a common body of knowledge that benefits and unites us all, or a fragmented planet in which access to information and opportunity is dependent on where you live and the whims of censors."
To be honest, I think she's right. While the idea of blocking harmful sites isn't a bad idea in itself, it's both unfeasible, and not particularly effective. To make matters worse though, the list of 'bad sites,' that the government was planning to block wasn't even shown to the Australian public. It had to be leaked. Not only are they trying to restrict access to the internet, but they aren't telling the public what it is they're blocking. Which meant that the government could potentially block a number of sites that aren't necessarily harmful, but that the government didn't want the public to see.

Now I'm not trying to sound like a crazy conspirist, wearing a tinfoil hat to stop the government from reading my mind, but that does bother me.

So yes, I think placing mandatory filters on the internet is undemocratic. It's forcing something on to the Australian public that many of them don't want. If you want to make the process democratic, have a vote on whether there should be a filter or not. And show the sites that will be blocked. That would be democratic.

References:

- Electronic Frontiers Australia, 'Learn More,' viewed 22 september at http://openinternet.com.au/learn_more/

- Dudley-Nicholson, J 2011, 'Telstra, Optus, to start censoring thye web next month,' viewed 22 September at http://www.news.com.au/technology/internet-filter/telstra-optus-to-begin-censoring-web-next-month/story-fn5j66db-1226079954138

- Jacobs, C 2010, 'The Future of Internet Censorship,' viewed 22 September at http://www.efa.org.au/2010/09/21/the-future-of-censorship/

- Clinton, H 2010, 'Remarks on Internet Freedom,' viewed 22 September at http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135519.htm

Essay Plan (Week 9)

This week we have to plan out our essay. To be honest, I've barely thought about it, given it's due in week 12, and that I have plenty of other assignments due earlier. But anyway.

Because I enjoyed The Matrix, and mainstream cyberpunk media, I figured I'd choose this question:


Choose a William Gibson short story such as Burning Chrome (see readings week 10). Compare the economic and social world it conjures with the imagined world of another cyberpunk author’s short story or novel. How close are these imagined worlds to our world and are we moving towards the imagined worlds or away from them?

As for what two stories I'd choose to compare, I thought I'd do Burning Chrome (seeing as it's a reading) and either Snow Crash, by Neal Stephenson (I read his Anathem, which was interesting) or Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, by Philip K. Dick (the inspiration behind Blade Runner). I still haven't decided, but really, for a basic plan, it doesn't matter.

So here's the plan.

1. Introduction.
    I'll probably introduce cyberpunk briefly, introduce the topic question, and outline the essay.

2. 1st Body Paragraph.
Old-School.
    Here I'll compare the economic world both books conjure. I'll detail them, compare them, and then further compare them with reality.

3. 2nd Body Paragraph.
    Here we'll focus on the social. Again, I'll compare and compare again.

4. Probably the conclusion, it's only 1000 words after all. Here I'll sum up, presenting a combined view of what cyberpunk predicts and reality as it is and what it might be. Here I'll explicitly answer the question, using all the afore paragraphs as evidence.

So that's the plan!

Tuesday, 20 September 2011

New Concept (again). (Week 8)

So after some experimentation, my most recent concept involving the city, didn't work. There wasn't enough of a narrative to it, it was just a collection of shots of different parts of the city.

So I decided to try a different tack. I hate horror movies, but they way that they influence the viewer - with shadows, soundtrack etc. is pretty cool. So I thought i'd give a survival horror film a try. I shot in my local church, with the help of some friends at night, using only my iPhone, as was my intention all along.

My new concept is:

'A man, alone at night in a deserted building, hears a noise, and seeks to find its cause.'

Here are some clips - I shot more than I used, as is usually the case.





I posted them on YouTube as well, but couldn't find them in the YouTube embedding tool. So I just uploaded them here.

Next step is to cut and edit everything, then whip up a soundtrack.