AV Production Tools and my Concept. (Week 6)

So the challenge over the next three weeks is to produce one or more short audio-visual pieces, preferably with a new communication technology theme, while all the time blogging about your experiences.

We have to come up with some tools we will probably use, along with a sentence-long concept that we're focusing on.

I own a Mac, so I'll be using iMovie to edit my footage, hopefully using my iPhone to shoot. (I'm an iGeek).

I'll be using Garageband and short clips of existing songs for my soundtrack, and as for the rest of it, we'll see how we go. I'll be blogging about the process as I go, so I'll keep you updated.





As for my concept,I figure I'll do:

'The Life of a City'

So we'll see how that goes. I'll keep this blog updated in regards to it anyway, so follow along!

Hollywood and the Internet (Week 6)

In the early days of the cinema, the film studios themselves owned both the theatres and the movie stars exclusively. Then came its first opponent - television, in 1939. However, a deal was soon struck, where Hollywood movies were played on television. Co-existence was established. Since then, both cinema and television have relied on technological advancements to keep things new and interesting with consumers.

So why doesn't the same thing happen with the internet? Why doesn't a 'deal get struck?' Why is it different?



Is the Internet killing the Film Industry?



James Camerons Avatar was a box office hit. It made more than $1 billion, and (unfortunately) plunged cinema back into a 3D frenzy. It was also downloaded illegally 16, 580, 000 times. Many have warned that illegal downloads through the internet is threatening the industry, and Film studios are taking legal action against ISP iinet, after claiming the ISP isn't doing enough to stop illegal downloads by its clients.

But is it really so grim? In his July 2008 article Cult Classics Take on the Blockbusters as Audiences Switch on to Internet Downloads, Geoffrey Macnab says "in the 1970's, Jack Valenti, head of the Motion Picture Association of America, warned that video would spell disaster for the film industry. In reality, within a few years, video began to generate more money for Hollywood than theatrical exhibition."

So can the internet and downloads help the film industry?

Films are already taking advantage of the Internet for advertising and marketing, with Snakes on a Plane advertised and promoted heavily through MySpace, and The Blair Witch Project also marketed heavily through the internet. Its international and 24-hour reach presents a unique tool for advertising movies and spreading information.

Hollywood studios are already expanding into the internet market, with Warner Bros and Facebook teaming up to distribute films over the internet, along with Netflix, Apple TV, LoveFilm, Movielink and Cinemanow. This allows users to legally purchase movies for a lot less than it costs to physically buy them in a store. Some movies are even receiving funding via the internet and social networks, with films like The Tunnel being funded by user donations and the final film then being released as a free torrent download.

There are also the possibilities that the internet offers to film studios. Instead of digitising film to edit it after shooting, and then converting it back to physical film when it's finished, studios could simply shoot, edit, and finish movies in a digital format and then stream it to theatres for much less, replacing the expensive and fragile 35mm tape. Studios could then release the movie at any time they wanted, digitally, instead of making audiences wait for months before they can legally buy it.

The internet has many possibilities in regards to cinema and the film industry. Studios are only just beginning to take advantage of this resource, after many years of fighting it. That said, these innovations and integrations won't stop piracy. But it will lessen it. Either way, the age of the internet is upon us, and Hollywood, though slow to adapt, is finally beginning to catch on.

References:

- Thorpe, V 2011 'Illegal movie downloads 'threaten the future of British film market,'' viewed 1 September at http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/13/illegal-downloads-threaten-british-film

- Physorg.com 2006 'Digital revolution takes on movie industry,' viewed 1 September at http://www.physorg.com/news63371606.html

- Dahdah, H 2008 'Film industry sues iiNet over BitTorrent downloads,' viewed 1 September at http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/268184/film_industry_sues_iinet_over_bittorrent_downloads/

- Biggin, M 2008 'Is Downloading Damaging the Film Industry?' viewed 1 September at http://www.suite101.com/content/downloading-or-going-to-the-cinema-a63443

- Film Industry Network, 2010 'Avatar breaks Star Trek illegal downloads record,' viewed 1 september at http://www.filmindustrynetwork.biz/avatar-breaks-star-trek-illegal-downloads-record/6761

-   Macnab, G 2008, 'Cult classics take on the blockbusters as audiences switch on to internet downloads,' viewed 1 September at http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/cult-classics-take-on-the-blockbusters-as-audiences-switch-on-to-internet-downloads-877798.html

Rubber - The Elements of Screenplay (Week 5)

Rubber is basically about a tire that gains sentience and rolls around searching for company, but after being denied that company, begins killing things. At the same time, there is an audience actually in the movie itself, watching it as a regular audience would, and providing comments at random intervals.

Rubber - a satire of the genre and film as a whole.

The setup of the screenplay takes place in a large, empty desert, used to emphasise the loneliness the tire feels. Warm and dry colours are used, as befitting a desert, while the soundtrack is mostly sound effects, with the odd song playing - both non-diegetic, and diegetic. The character of the tire is introduced, and the audience is positioned to empathise with the abandoned tire as it learns how to move, begins to discover its powers, and searches for knowledge of itself and company. Even when it begins killing, it’s presented not as malicious, but rather as a childlike curiosity that resonates with audience members. In Act 1, ‘Just Don’t Want to be Lonely’ begins to play non-diegetically after the tire has killed its first victim. The song, along with the movements of the tire itself reveal both its desire for company along with its childlike nature, which is also emphasised at the very beginning on the film, when it learns to roll properly.

Even just in Act 1 of Rubber, despite its mockery of cinema, the narrative conventions and the 5 essential elements of plot are evident.

The central character, although not human centred, is anthropomorphised, allowing audience members to empathise and relate. It has obvious desires (to have company), and is clearly motivated. It seeks to overcome the various obstacles before it (initially learning to move, discovering its powers, and seeking company), and, although we only watched the first act, probably continues to follow the pattern and succeeds in overcoming its obstacles – to a certain extent.

Rubber is a movie that both mocks the narrative structure, and the conventions of film, while at the same time succeeding in utilising those same structures. It’s a satire of both the ‘innocuous everyday object attacks!’ horror genre, as well as a satire of film itself.

References:

- Jacobs, C. P n.d., Film Theory and Approaches to Criticism, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.und.edu/instruct/cjacobs/FilmTheory&Analysis.htm

- Field, S 2011, The Paradigm Worksheet, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.sydfield.com/featured_theparadigmworksheet.htm

The Scavenger Hunt (Week 5)

In a similar vein to last week, this week we have to find answers to the following questions. But we couldn't use Google or Wikipedia.
Here's how I went.

1. Where was the first University established, and in which year? 
The University of Al-Karaouine or Al-Qarawiyyin, is located in Morocco, and is considered by Guinness World Records (1998) to be the oldest continuously operating academic degree-granting university in the world. It was built in 859 AD.

2. What is Stephen Stockwell's band called and what does he play?  Can you name a couple of their songs?
His band is called The Black Assassins, and he plays the keyboard. Some of their songs are ASIO, Going to the Wedding, Stompetition, and White Lies. 

3. What is the weight of the world’s biggest machine? How much did it cost to build?
The worlds largest machine is the Large Hadron Collider, a giant scientific machine located under the border of Switzerland and France. It cost about 3 billion euros to build, and is 27km in circumference, weighing at more than 38 000 tonnes.

4. Who is Justin Bieber's lawyer, and what is the best way (quickest, most reliable) to contact the lawyer?
Justin Bieber's lawyer is Kenneth A Feinswog, and can be contacted by phone on (310) 846-5800, or by email at kfeinswog@aol.com. 

5. What is the cheapest form of travel from the Gold Coast to Melbourne?
The cheapest is obviously by foot. But seeing as that would take a really long time, here's a more practical answer. the cheapest flight I could find was $85, found here.

6. Who is Hatsune Miku? What company does she belong to? What is her birthday?
Hatsune Miku is a female singing synthesizer application developed by Yamaha, and created by Crypton Future Media. Soon, she gained popularity with fans as people posted songs they had created, and a character to represent the voice was designed. She has become a pop-idol, despite being virtual, and fans all over the world celebrate her birthday on the 31st of August.

7. Find a live webcam in Belarus. Find a place to stay in Antarctica.
A live webcam overlooking Lenin square in Babruysk, Belarus, can be viewed here.
As for accommodation in Antarctica, Union Glacier is home to the Adventure Network International’s base camp, the only private camp in Antarctica. You can find out more about it here.
Information sourced from the links, via Yahoo.

8. What song was top of the Australian pop charts this week in 1991?
This week, back in 1991, Bryan Adams' song '(Everything I Do) I Do It For You,' was no. 1 in Australia.

9. What type of car is used to make ‘Google Street View’?
Google uses a variety of adapted cars with roof-mounted cameras to take footage for use in Street View. They also use tricycles, snowmobiles, and trolleys.

10. Translate these questions into Spanish and then translate them back into English.
Being a fan of Douglas Adams, I decided to use Babel Fish for this task. The answers are as follows:

1. Where the first university was established and in what year?
2. Which is Stephen Stockwell' the bandage of called s and what he does plays? Can you name a pair of your songs?
3. Which is the weight of the greatest machine of the world? How much it cost to construct?
4. Who is Justin Bieber' lawyer of s, and which is the best contact of the way (possible, more fast most reliable) the lawyer?
5. Which is the cheapest form of route of the Gold Coast to Melbourne?
6. Who is Hatsune Miku? What company she belongs? Which is its birthday?
7. It finds webcam alive in Belarus. It finds a place to remain in Ant3artida.
8. What song was the cover of Australian letters of the outbreak this week in 1991?
9. What type of car is used to make the View'? of the street of Google of `
10. It translates these questions to Spanish later and tradúzcalo again within English.


Well, there we go. Scavenger Hunt complete!


References:

- Abid Ayub, M 2010, Oldest Educational Institute of World Founded by a Muslim Woman, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.ilmkidunya.com/edunews/oldest-educational-institute-of-world-founded-by-a-muslim-woman-4555.aspx

-  The Black Assassins Home, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.blackassassins.net/index.html
- Holdsworth, B 1982, The Black Assassins, viewed 25 August 2011, http://web.revolutionrock.com.au/oral-hist/index.php?id=24

- Large Hadron Collider, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.largehadroncollider.info/
- CERN 2008, LHC - Facts and Figures, viewed 25 August 2011, http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Facts-en.html
- LHC FAQ, viewed 25 August 2011, http://lhc.ac.uk/about-the-lhc/faqs.html

- Lawyer Wants Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber Cartoon Strip Pulled, 2010, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.zimbio.com/Justin+Bieber/articles/DXFXHtODSFC/Lawyer+Wants+Lady+Gaga+Justin+Bieber+Cartoon
- State Bar of California 2010, Kenneth Alan Feinswog - #129562, viewed 25 August 2011, http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/129562

- Virgin Australia 2011, Flight Specials, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.virginaustralia.com/?city=OOL

- Rice, B 2008, Happy Birthday, hatsune Miku!, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.japanator.com/happy-birthday-hatsune-miku--8598.phtml
- What's Hot: Hatsune Miku, viewed 25 August 2011, http://kidmania.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/whats-hot-hatsune-miku/

- Adventure Network International, 2011, Union Glacier Camp, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.adventure-network.com/union-glacier-camp
- Splendid Live View of Lenin Square, Babruysk, Belarus, viewed 25 August 2011, http://www.travelcams.net/network/camera/live-webcams/europe/belarus/babruysk-center.html

- Medien H, 2011, Single Top 50, 1991, viewed 25 August 2011, http://australian-charts.com/weekchart.asp?cat=s&year=1991&date=19910825

- Google Maps Technology, n.d, Cars, Trikes, and More, viewed 25 August 2011, http://maps.google.com/help/maps/streetview/technology/cars-trikes.html

- Yahoo!7 Babel Fish, viewed 25 August 2011, http://au.babelfish.yahoo.com/?fr=bf-res

Yahoo! was used as the primary search engine in this exercise, and was used to find all of these websites - the only exceptions being the websites that I already knew.

Did social media cause the British Riots? (Week 4)

In the lecture today, and the reading, we looked at the existence of cyberspace, and the different realities that are present. And, interestingly enough, this questions blurs the line between two of them. On the one hand, you have the physical reality. In this reality, riots sprung up all over England a couple of weeks ago, both in reaction to the police shooting of a local man, Mark Duggan, and to budget cuts in social welfare. On the other hand, you have the web, cyberspace. Rioters used sms, twitter, and facebook to help co-ordinate and plan the riots. The two realities bled into each other, each having direct effects on the other.
But did social media cause the riots? Would they have happened even without the use of social media? What was the cause of the riots?

Facebook was certainly the medium for an online forum for people to mourn - and swear vengeance for - the death of Tottenham resident Mark Duggan. Shortly before 10:30 at night, protestors swung into action, setting a double-decker bus alight, and posting on the Facebook page: "Please upload any pictures or video's you may have from tonight in Tottenham. Share it with people to send the message out as to why this has blown into a riot."

This was the only sign on Facebook that the otherwise peaceful protest would escalate to violence and looting. Twitter was used more in this way, although after police spotted tweets planning attacks on Sundays Hackney Carnival, it was abruptly canceled.
The police afterward issued a warning to those considering using twitter as a platform for organising violence.

While The Daily Mail claimed there were “fears that violence was fanned by Twitter as picture of burning police car was re-tweeted more than 100 times,” and The Sun wrote an article on "Rioting thugs use twitter to boost their numbers"; it was found that the private Blackberry messenger network was far more instrumental in the co-ordinating of riots and looting, with many of the messages untraceable by authorities.
One Blackberry message retrieved read: "Everyone from all sides of London meet up at the heart of London (central) OXFORD CIRCUS!!, Bare SHOPS are gonna get smashed up so come get some (free stuff!!!) fuck the feds we will send them back with OUR riot! >:O Dead the ends and colour war for now so if you see a brother... SALUT! if you see a fed... SHOOT!"



Facebook - helping looters dob themselves in since 2011.



But still, while social media and Blackberry messaging allowed the co-ordination and planning of the riots, did they cause it? I don't believe so, any more than a gun is guilty for a murder. Social media is a tool. It's the people using it that are responsible, and to be honest, if they planned a riot, whether they could do it on twitter or not wouldn't have stopped them. It may have made things easier - and maybe even have increased the scale - but the riots would've happened regardless. 

What social media is doing however, is allowing aiding of police in identifying looters and rioters. Particularly idiots who post photos of themselves with the stuff they've just looted.

References:
- Keane, B 2011, London riots: The (social) media is to blame, apparently, viewed 17 August 2011, <http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/10/london-riots-the-social-media-is-to-blame-apparently/>
- Halliday, J 2011, London riots: How Blackberry Messenger played a key role, viewed 17 August 2011, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/aug/08/london-riots-facebook-twitter-blackberry>
- Moses, A 2011, London social media blocks 'totalitarian,' viewed 17 August 2011, <http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/london-riot-social-media-blocks-totalitarian-20110812-1iq0o.html>

Facebook terms of service and privacy problems. (Week 4)

I use Facebook every day. I'm an addict. Although, I'd be surprised to meet a university student that wasn't. But despite the fact that I use it every day, I've never read the terms of service. It's the big, long, list of things you can and can't do, things Facebook can and can't do, things advertisers can and can't do, etc. It's a lot easier to just click 'accept' and get past the boring stuff. That said, it's a good idea to know what you're getting yourself into. Because there are some things on there that you should know before you start posting pictures of yourself online and publishing your personal information.

Facebooks terms of service make for long and dry reading. Fortunately, the guys over at Slacktory dumbed it down, and added plenty of swearwords to make it less like a legal document and more readable.

This picture - if it's on Facebook, it's theirs.

In essence, Facebook owns the things you post. Pictures, videos, they can use them however they like. If you deactivate your account to try and get rid of it, Facebook will still have all the information from your profile. And if you delete your account trying to get rid of it, then they'll still have it for 90 days. And, if any of your friends reposted your stuff, or have it up, then Facebook can continue to use it however they like. As long as its on the site, they can do what they want with it - even if they wanted to make a coffee table book of peoples embarassing drunken photos.

Facebook also finds out where you are using it, your IP address, other websites you're accessing, and what sort of device you're using to access it. It can then give this information to advertising companies, so that the ads you see on your homepage - personally picked for you.

That said, while Facebook may seem like it'll evolve into Skynet at the drop of a hat, it also has a number of protective measures in place. People can't say whatever they want, hate speech and that sort of thing are banned. People can't post pornographic images, or do anything that compromises someone elses rights, and they can't post viruses. Privacy settings aren't compromised - although beware if your settings are on 'everyone.' That means that literally everyone, even if they don't have a Facebook account, can access all your information.

So while not exactly unexpected (apart from the ownership issues on media you post), Facebooks Terms of Service are well worth a read so you know what you're getting yourself into. And if you're wanting to advertise or make any money on Facebook, there are another whole set of rules to read.

For further information, you can check out Facebooks official TOS here.


References:

- Lothe, M 2011, The Entire Facebook terms of Service in Bro Speak, viewed 18 August 2011, http://slacktory.com/2011/08/entire-facebook-terms-of-service-in-bro-speak/

- Facebook, 2010, Facebook's Privacy Policy, viewed 18 August 2011, http://www.facebook.com/policy.php

The Singularity. (Week 3)

So this week, the lecture was on the history of computers and the internet. While interesting, it was quite straightforward. The reading, however, focused on the idea of the singularity - a 'long standing science fiction dream of melding machine and man to create a better species,' along with privacy issues and issues of the net in general. Now I enjoy sci-fi. The Matrix was one of the most thought provoking movies ever made in this genre, along with Blade Runner, and the lesser known Japanese animation Ghost in the Shell. So that's what I'm going to be focusing on in this post in reaction to the reading.



Is this the future?

In reference to the reading, Michael Chorost believes that the future of technology lies with neural implants in our brains, giving us complete access to the internet, and merging it seamlessly as part of us - as though it were our hands. This idea of 'improving' ourselves using technology isn't a new one, with long standing debate in medicine, sports, education and genetics over repair and enhancement, and with science fiction writers like David Ritchie predicting 'biochips,' a synthesis of human and artificial intelligence.

While perhaps developments of this precise nature are unlikely, the ethical and moral questions of enhancement through technology are likely to plague us as technology develops. Mobile phones have undergone rapid changes in just 10 to 20 years, as has the internet itself. This reality is not only possible, but also relatively close, due to the great leaps in technological development. In fact, it's closer than you think, with a team of bioengineers today announcing that they have created electronic circuits that can be integrated into human skin. Is technological enhancement ethical? Will it compromise our integrity as humans? Or is it the latest technical innovation, to be embraced? The latest Facebook, something that everyone will use, regardless of the risks? Just think if we were connected to the web permanently, via chips in our heads. We would be fused with the web, able to access any information we like. But think of the privacy issues we have with the web today - and then imagine those risks in your head.

While still the domain of science fiction writers and theorists, the time will soon arrive when we have to seriously consider the implications of 'enhancing' ourselves with technology. Whether it's right or wrong, whether we're compromising our humanity by doing so, or whether there's nothing wrong with 'improving' ourselves. So I'd like to invite readers to leave their opinions in the comments section. Do you think integrating ourselves with technology is wrong? Are we already doing it, just not in a physical sense? What do you think?

In the meantime, I'll leave you with a trailer from a video game thats due to be released soon, named Deus Ex: Human Revolution. It's a cleverly made, live-action trailer set in the games universe - Earth, 2027. It focuses on the moral and ethical implications of human augmentation, or enhancement, and shows a future that is scarily possible.

References:

- Gonzalez, R 2011, Breakthrough: Electronic Circuits that are Integrated with your Skin, viewed 11 August 2011, <http://io9.com/5830071/breakthrough-electronic-circuits-that-are-integrated-into-your-skin>



- Halpern, S 2011, Mind Control & the Internet, viewed 11 August 2011, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jun/23/mind-control-and-internet/?page=1

Napster - making piracy popular. (Week 3)

The second task for this week was to research an 'old' internet community/medium - one that has faded from popularity for whatever reason. Given the popularity of downloading media from the internet, I thought I'd take a look at Napster.

Napster was created by 19 year old college dropout Shawn Fanning, in 1999. It was a program that allowed users to transfer data (specifically .mp3 music files) between computers, and enabled them to find each other via a centralised directory. Basically, it gave users access to free music. While it seems obvious that this would have serious legal repercussions, John Fanning, Shawns uncle and co-owner, contacted lawyers in Napsters initial stages and obtained advice that gave him the confidence to keep going with the business - and that if they were sued, they'd have a good chance at winning.
Meanwhile, Napster was popular. In 2000 and 2001, some 60 million people around the globe were exchanging music, and in some university campuses in America, Napster was taking up 75-80% of their bandwidth.
Naturally, this level of popularity drew the eyes of artists whose songs were being freely given, and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), who took Napster to court for copyright infringement. Then, in February of 2001, a judge ruled that Napster had to cease the distribution of copyrighted materials, and remove a list of over 250000 song titles. Despite this, in July, a judge further ruled that Napster had to block all files that infringed copyright, effectively shutting it down completely.

 Despite its fall, Napster had a huge influence on the way the web is used today. People from all over the world can, and still do, download .mp3 files from the internet, skirting the law and venturing into areas the record labels deem as 'piracy.' It inspired Limewire, a similar program that was similarly shut down due to legal action, and kicked off the age of media download from the internet and P2P file sharing.

References:
- 'This week in history: The death spiral of Napster begins' 2001, viewed 11 August 2011, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-death-spiral-of-napster-begins

- Ante, S, 2000, 'Inside Napster,' Bloomburg Businessweek, viewed 11 August 2011, http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_33/b3694001.htm

- McManus, S, 2003, A short history of file sharing, viewed 11 August 2011, http://www.sean.co.uk/a/musicjournalism/var/historyoffilesharing.shtm

A database treasure(?) hunt. (Week 3)

This week we have a list of questions to find answers to, using the university databases. The questions are as follows: 

1. What was Stephen Stockwell's first article in an academic journal? What year? Provide a full citation. What database did you use?

Stockwell, S, 1981, 'Kuranda Police Shooting,' Legal Service Bulletin, vol. 6, pp.48, viewed 11 August 2011, via Griffith University Search.

2. In which comic did Governor Slugwell appear? Which Issues? Give their full citation for the earliest. Where did you find this information? What database did you use? (Check the trial databases)

Governor Slugwell appears in Flaming Carrot Comics, in issues 7, 10, and 11. The full citation for the earliest:

Burden, B, 1985, 'When the Shoes aren't worth the Shine,' Flaming Carrot Comics, Renegade Press, vol. 7, pp 3-31, viewed 11 August 2011, via Underground and Independent Comics database.

3. What is the latest medical thinking on the dangers of mobile phones? Provide a full citation

That although the radiation they emit has the potential to be dangerous, they typically don't emit enough to be of any worry. 

Bowditch, P, 2011, 'Are Invisible Rays frying Your Brain?' Australasian Science, vol. 32, no. 6, pp.44, viewed 11 August 2011, via ProQuest database.

4. In Bladerunner, what is Leon's reaction when Holden asks him about his mother? Quote the 1982 draft script and provide a full reference. (Check the trial databases) 

Holden:

Describe in single words. Only the good things that come into mind. About your mother.

Leon:

My...

Leon looks shocked, surprised. But the needles in the computer barely move. Holden goes for the inside of his coat. But big Leon is faster. His laser burns a hole the size of a nickel through Holden's stomach. Unlike a bullet, a laser causes no impact. It goes through Holden's shoulder and comes out of his back, clean as a whistle. Like a rag doll he falls back into the seat. Big slow Leon is already walking away, but he stops, turns, and with a little smile of satisfaction fires through the back of the seat.      

Francher, H, Peoples, D W, Kibbee, R 1982. Blade Runner (1982): Draft Script, viewed 11 August 2011, <http://solomon.afso.alexanderstreet.com.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/cgi-bin/asp/philo/afso/getvolume.pl?FS001268-1#FS001268-1-2>

5. What does Paul Soukup say Walter Ong saw as the main paradox in 20th century communication? Cite your source.

Paul Soukup writes,
"The 20th century introduced a paradox: “that a
society given so much to the use of diagrams and to the
maneuvering of objects in space . . . should at the same
time develop means of communication which specialize
not in sight but in sound.”
Soukup, P, 2004, 'Walter J. Ong, S.J. A Retrospective,' Communication Research Trends, vol.23, no.1, viewed 11 August 2011. 

The progression of communication technology - the last chapter for hardcopy books? (Week 2)

Despite my other posts for week 2, I realised I hadn't created a post that looked reflected on the readings and lecture. So here it is.
Initially, in the lecture, we looked at the progression of communication. Starting with oral communication (a constant throughout time), and working our way to written communication - rock art, the use of an alphabet, and the natural progression of utilising that alphabet to create tablets, scrolls, and then books.

The Kindle and the iPhone - two devices
that can read e-books.

I find this particular progression intresting - because of the current trend of e-books, and electronic reading devices, like the Kindle, or iPad. Is this the next step in a progression that dates back to the 33rd century BC? Will students in a couple of hundred years look back, and see these devices replacing the paper pages of the book?
The publishing industry is on shaky ground. In the past couple of months, we've seen book-selling behemoth Borders close the doors on many of its stores, along with Angus & Robertson. Meanwhile, online seller Amazon report that as of May 2011, they are selling more Kindle e-books than both hardcover and paperback books combined.
Personally, I think the e-book is the next step in the evolutionary timeline of written communication. With the advent of text messaging via mobile phones, and tablet computers aiming to replace paper, it's only natural that the physical book would be digitally replaced as well. the e-book readers allow thousands of books to be stored on a device the size of an A5 sheet of paper. They can be purchased and downloaded wirelessly from anywhere with an internet connection, and, once paid for, can be downloaded multiple times.
That said, similar to the CD being replaced by mp3 files, books will still last. Despite being effectively replaced in the progression of written technology, they will still be around, they will still be bought, and appreciated. Some people prefer the sound, smell, and sensation of holding a paper book, than the sterile electronic screen of an e-book.
Back in my second post, in the first week of tutorial tasks, I answered a question - 'When do new technologies become old?' I wrote that a technology would become old when it was succeeded by a technology that could do whatever it could - and more. This definition certainly seems applicable. The e-book can do everything a hardcopy can - and then some. I think that this is the next step, the current analogue device being replaced by digital, in a digital age.

References:

- McGaughey, W 2005, Some Dates in the History of Cultural Technologies, viewed 6 August 2011, http://worldhistorysite.com/culttech.html

- Amazon.com 2011, Amazon.com Now Selling More Kindle Books than Print Books, viewed 6 August 2011, http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1565581&highlight

- Auletta, K 2010, Publish or Perish, viewed 6 August 2011, <http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/04/26/100426fa_fact_auletta>

- Toppo, G 2009, School chooses Kindle; are libraries for the history 'books'?, viewed 6 August 2011, <http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2009-10-26-kindle-school-library_N.htm>

Nutshell Mail, and an Anthroplogical Introduction to YouTube. (Week 2)

Now, the first part of the tutorial tasks!
I've found a useful application for people who have a lot of activity on their Facebook page, and who don't want about 20 new emails letting you know all about it. Now yes, you can choose to turn off that setting - or you could use Nutshell Mail! Nutshell mail is basically an application that will send you an email regularly, letting you know about the various things that have happened on your Facebook page! So, in one handy email, you can know everything that Facebook would have felt it necessary to let you know by spamming your inbox with email. Another useful aspect, for those of you out there who also tweet, tumblr, and subscribe to YouTube channels, is that you can combine these all into one notification email. So you can learn everything that happened on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and YouTube in one email.

Now, a video relating to New Communication Technology. I noticed a lot of people plugging that phrase into YouTube during the tutorial, looking for a video. But this one - is about YouTube itself. 

This video was presented to the Library of Congress 3 years ago by Prof. Michael Wesch, an Anthropology lecturer in Kansas, America. It's basically a lecture on the enormous impacts that YouTube, and the Internet, have had on our society, culture, and the we relate and communicate. It's relation to this particular course is obvious - it's an analysis of the effects that a New Communication Technology, embraced by people around the world, has had on us, as both an audience and participant in this communication revolution. It's a long video - about 55 minutes, but it's well worth watching. I guarantee it will change the way you look at not only YouTube, but also the Internet itself.

References:

- Wesch, M 2008, An Anthropological Introduction to YouTube, video recording, YouTube, viewed 3 August 2011, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPAO-lZ4_hU>

Myspace, Facebook, and communication. (Week 2)

I've decided to post my response to the second of the tutorial activities, first - just to keep you all on your toes.
I personally use many forms of new communication technologies to communicate and interact with friends and family.

Initially - like every high-schooler my age back then, I used Myspace. Now vastly overshadowed by Facebook, it was my first experience of interacting with friends on a social networking site - and my first real foray into the social side of cyberspace. It was great. You could have your own customisable page, talk with your friends online, comment on their pictures...And then, about 3 - 4 years ago, the great migration to Facebook. At first, it was the intruder on the social website scene - viewed as a 'wannabe myspace.' But soon, I found that my friends had all made the transition, and, seeing as the point of the website was about interacting with friends, I too, crossed over.

Myspace - BFb (Before Facebook)

It's still a useful tool that I use frequently today. It allows you to keep in contact with friends whom you haven't seen in years, as well as being able to keep up to date with people you see practically every day. While I don't really use Facebook to keep in touch with my direct family - after a disastrous month where I added my mother as a 'friend' - I do use it to communicate with my cousins, and other relatives who live far away.

In terms of privacy, and concerns about it - It is a concern, admittedly, but no more than say, getting hit by a car. People are out there on the web, trying to steal information or lure you into meeting them via Facebook message, but seriously - in my experience, you have to be pretty dense to fall for their scams. While it's true Facebook does collect information on their users, (and pictures as I talked about in last weeks post), it's simple enough a problem to avoid - just don't put any sensitive information on the internet. Simple. And applicable to anything on the web.

In response to the last point, no, I don't have any purely online friends. It's an interesting question though - is a person you meet only online a friend in the same sense as those meet physically? You do some of the same things, after all - talking, you can do things online together, games etc. But at the same time, you don't actually meet them. So I would argue that a 'virtual' friend isn't the same as a physical one. There are more options with a friend in reality - you get to know them better, get to know their mannerisms, and can do a greater variety of things. While I wouldn't say that people you interact with solely online aren't real friends, I would argue that friends you make in reality are better friends.